The wheels were turning after a brief conversation with Matt Vaudrey.
What if tests were just easier?
What if we just made tests easier? What if on test day they walked in peaceful, knowing it wasn’t going to be that bad? What if they went home feeling more confident about math because of the test? What if students left class, after a test, feeling awesome?

What if this was a happy day instead of the dreaded test day?
Does it have to be bad? Does it have to be hard? What if tests were more straight forward, clear, direct? What if I saved the complex, interesting, real world problems that synthesized information for in-class activities instead of tests? What if we did all that cool stuff together? Where more meaningful discussions could happen? Where opportunities for students to learn collaboratively was possible? Where I could monitor student progress more closely, in real time?
What if testing them meant something different? What if we changed the intent of the test? What if testing didn’t mean giving them a set of problems to complete just to spend hours grading, for it to only give me assessment data that I already know? What if tests weren’t only used as indicators of what students know and what they don’t know? What if we used math tests differently? What if we used tests for a different purpose? What if math tests had additional purpose? Do you know your test’s purpose? Does your test have a purpose?

Maybe learning stops when a test score is issued? What if tests didn’t have grades? What if we just highlighted mistakes to fix? Maybe learning would continue? (Stay tuned, I just did this…I’ll blog about the results soon!)
What if tests were used to build math confidence instead of beating that confidence down? What if tests were used to positively reinforce being brave, taking risks, and flexing those problem solving skills we so desperately try to develop in them? What if we used other forms of assessments to test knowledge in addition to tests? What if we used other assessments INSTEAD of tests?
What if we stopped testing students to see if they take that amazing problem, make the right connections on a paper/pencil test that we grade right/wrong and then give them points, update the grade online, give the test back, and then MOVE ON to the next chapter NEVER to talk to them about how freaking awesome that problem was?! I mean…
What if?
Maybe my students would feel more confident about their math skills? Maybe my students would focus on learning and not on point gathering? Maybe my students would feel empowered in a math classroom instead of discouraged? Maybe it would change their attitudes about math? Maybe their parents’ attitudes would change too? Maybe they would all stop saying, “I’m just not a math person”? Maybe they would all stop forgiving themselves for not being good at math and start trying to be good at math? Maybe my students would enjoy math more?
Maybe my students would take more risks? Maybe the increased confidence will make them brave when given a problem they’ve never seen before? Maybe it would make them fearless mathematicians?! Ooooohhhhh, FEARLESS MATHEMATICIANS! Maybe it would make them better problem solvers? Maybe their performance would be stronger because they would be more willing to perform? And maybe, just maybe, we’d see that translate into something measurable, in something valued by education…like standardized test scores?
Maybe it’s worth a shot to just make the test easier?


